Pages

Subscribe:

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Apple launches iTunes Match cloud music service

After months of waiting, another massive piece of Apple’s cloud giving has finally been released to the public: iTunes Match.

You might keep in mind the name from approach back at Apple’s Worldwide Developer’s Conference 2011 in June, when then-CEO Steve Jobs announced the service as a part of Apple’s iOS five operating system. in conjunction with iTunes within the Cloud, iTunes Match permits users access to their music wherever they're, with the employment of many completely different devices.

Unlike Google Music or the Amazon Cloud Player, each streaming music services where users upload their actual music tracks to a cloud server and then stream them back to numerous devices, iTunes Match includes minimal actual uploading. Instead, iTunes scans users’ music libraries and “matches” all the tracks that are contained in Apple’s servers. something you bought from iTunes goes in automatically, and the rest is matched by the system to convey you a high-quality 256 kilobits per second version of the track, notwithstanding whether or not your copy is of a lesser quality.

Anything from your library that Apple doesn’t have in its iTunes servers and can’t match gets uploaded to Apple’s cloud servers, that still provides you access to your tracks notwithstanding you didn’t purchase them from iTunes. And with iTunes within the Cloud, you’re capable of seeing each track you’ve purchased with the service and might redownload it at can (instead of simply streaming with iTunes Match). As Mashable found out in its review of the service, you'll be able to produce playlist and sensible playlists on your iOS devices, and iTunes within the Cloud can share them along with your different devices, like your computers (and vice versa).

According to laptop World, however, there are still some limitations on the iTunes Match service. in contrast to Amazon or Google’s cloud music services, iTunes Match doesn’t nonetheless support massive music libraries – users are restricted to twenty five,000 songs apiece for his or her $25 per year price of entry. However, something you get from iTunes doesn’t count toward that total; it’s solely tracks that you simply haven’t purchased through Apple. Also, a minimum of for currently, iTunes Match is barely offered within the us.

The and facet is that iTunes Match permits die-hard iTunes users a cloud various to the services offered from the likes of Google, Amazon and players like mSpot. Services offered by iCloud mean that Apple users don’t need to keep plenty of music tracks stored on a machine for all eternity: New cloud-based services mean that if you’ve got a reliable web association, you may presumably ditch all of your stored copies of songs and simply stream to your heart’s content.

Apple’s iCloud service and every one the items that keep company with it are the newest iterations of its MobileMe service, however despite their similarities, it looks Apple has rethought how it handles the cloud when the relative failure of the MobileMe service. Whereas that service handled countless various things like calendars, tasks, email and thus on (many of that are still handled by iCloud), when it involves a subscription service, Apple is streamlining its approach all the way down to simply music and maybe another items of purchased content. during this approach, it looks that Apple are ready to (hopefully) avoid service interruptions and keep customers happy as they transition to the cloud. It’s possible that iTunes Match are a well-liked service if Apple has learned from its mistakes and runs iTunes Match also because it sounds like it'll.

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Apple is Removing Cloud Music Apps from the App Store

In the latest example of Apple’s worry of competition, the corporate has removed a third-party app from its App Store that permits individuals to access music stored on Amazon’s Cloud Drive.

Amazon’s Cloud Drive could be a direct competitor of Apple’s iCloud service, that stores a range of content — music, books, photos, contacts, calendars, and a lot of — related to a person’s Apple ID account and pushes it to all or any their iOS devices.

While Amazon doesn’t have a Cloud Drive iOS app, development company Interactive Innovative Solutions (IIS) has developed an application, known as aMusic, which will enable iOS device house owners to access Amazon’s service. However, the aMusic app was recently removed attributable to legal problems with the music business, in keeping with a report from Evolver.fm.

Unlike each Apple’s iCloud and Google’s Music Beta services, Amazon’s Cloud Drive doesn’t catalog all the licensed music in a very person’s account. however cataloging is vital to music labels as a result of it allows them to require a cut when individuals upload copyrighted music to their account. Since Amazon isn’t lucrative for the music labels, the labels had no drawback contacting their buddies at Apple to urge any Cloud Drive app or service removed.

Normally, i might simply blame the music labels for this mess, however Apple is additionally delaying an update to IIS’ Google Music Beta app, gMusic. “I submitted it two weeks ago. each different update I even have submitted at intervals the two weeks has been approved in beneath eight hours. thus undecided what the deal is,” said IIS’ James Clancey in a very statement to Evolver.fm.

I can’t entirely blame Apple for its behavior, since it clearly has no incentive to permit its customers to use a competitor’s music service like Music Beta or Cloud Drive on iOS devices. Doing thus would provide individuals a reason to not register for Apple’s iTunes Match — a $25-per-year music service that has legal access to any songs currently in a very user’s iTunes music library.

At identical time, it's obtaining slightly ridiculous for Apple to stay removing all potential competitors within the streaming media front out of worry that it'd take business away. Yesterday, I reported on the ridiculous lengths Apple has gone to to prevent iOS customers from viewing streaming video service Hulu on a tv set.

I highly doubt Apple’s hardcore fan base goes to prevent using Apple services simply because there are competitors obtainable. maybe a number of them can, however not enough to create a big impact on business selections.